Exclusives news Statements

Is Hichilema the lapdog of Zambia’s mining companies?

Hakainde-Hichilema

 

By Sishuwa Sishuwa

Within the 2019 nationwide price range, the Minister of Finance proposed a number of modifications to Zambia’s mining tax regime. In addition to introducing a 1.5 per cent improve in mineral royalty charges, Margaret Mwanakatwe additionally imposed a 5 per cent import obligation on copper concentrates and a 15 per cent export obligation on valuable metals. Mwanakatwe additional abolished the Worth Added Tax and changed it with a non-refundable Gross sales Tax. The response from mining corporations was an instantaneous menace to put off staff and scale down their operations. ‘If the 2019 Price range proposals are enacted, Zambia may have by far the very best tax burden of mining nations [and] greater than half of [the country’s] copper mines will grow to be loss making’, claimed Goodwell Mateyo, the president of the Chamber of Mines. ‘The one operational response obtainable’, Mateyo added, ‘can be to reduce sure operations, scale back capital expenditure, and mine solely the very best grades out there. The undesirable impact of those survival measures will probably be misplaced manufacturing, misplaced funding, misplaced employment, and fewer provides and items procured from different elements of the financial system’.

The brand new mining tax proposals have attracted plaudits from most Zambians who’ve lengthy sought a good proportion of the income from the nation’s mineral wealth. Opposition United Get together for Nationwide Improvement (UPND) chief Hakainde Hichilema is nevertheless not amongst them. Showing on Radio Christian Voice’s Chat Again programme on 18 January 2019, Hichilema refused to render his help to the proposed tax measures and as an alternative gave a collection of elusive replies to the interviewer’s questions on mining coverage. So disenchanted concerning the authorities’s tax proposals are mining corporations, Hichilema revealed, that they’ve advised him they can’t anticipate him to get elected to the presidency so as to type out the mess within the sector. “The mining corporations are saying ‘HH [Hakainde Hichilema] we’re ready so that you can come [into power]. We can pay the tax which you’ll introduce as a result of we all know it’s a truthful tax’.” What can we make of all this?

The primary level to notice is that Hichilema’s feedback on the proposed mining coverage reveal his distinctive political ineptitude and lift critical questions concerning the nature of his relationship with mining corporations. Is Hichilema the mines’ man? I personally couldn’t consider that anybody in his place would publicly declare that mining corporations are lining up a specific political chief and expressing a want for that chief to take energy instantly. Furthermore, the UPND chief had completely no have to say what he did, because the journalist didn’t ask him whether or not or not mining corporations need him elected. All that the journalist sought was Hichilema’s easy reply to an easy query: does he assume mining taxes must be elevated, decreased or keep the identical? Hichilema struggled to offer a transparent response and was frustratingly obscure about what insurance policies his authorities would implement in Zambia’s essential financial sector. Aside from promising to revert to a VAT tax mechanism, he failed to stipulate what precisely is fallacious with the PF’s strategy to mining and what he would do in another way. When Information Diggers subsequently gave him a chance to make clear his place on the brand new mining taxes, Hichilema remained largely elusive and devoted a lot of his response to denying accusations from the governing Patriotic Entrance (PF) that he’s within the deep pockets of mining corporations, arguing that the ruling get together intentionally twisted his feedback with a purpose to achieve political mileage. It will be a pricey mistake for Hichilema to assume that it is just PF supporters who take situation together with his pronouncements on the mining situation.

Multinational mining corporations in Zambia usually are not seemed upon favourably by a lot of the nation’s inhabitants. I do know many Zambians who don’t help the PF however who each help the brand new tax measures and have expressed large disappointment with Hichilema’s feedback. Mining corporations are presently engaged in what can solely be termed as an try and blackmail Zambia. They’ve threatened to sack hundreds of staff until the taxes are lowered. The PF has commendably, if maybe solely briefly, stood as much as the mines, who’ve had a candy deal in Zambia in recent times. Hichilema nevertheless is selecting at this significant juncture to determine himself with the mining corporations. This can certainly develop into a stone round his neck if he ever stands in one other election. I do know that division has grow to be a attribute of Zambia’s politics, however there are specific sectors the place it’s in one of the best curiosity for everybody to tug collectively, notably with regards to guaranteeing the elemental pursuits and safety of residents. For instance, Zambia wins if there’s a unified voice towards: the low public earnings from the mining sector ensuing from the infectiveness of the Zambia Income Authority, low taxes, switch pricing and poorly negotiated improvement agreements between mining corporations and the federal government; the exploitation of Zambian staff or the dispossession of rural residents of their land and livelihoods; the prevention of instability within the nation by avoiding enterprise offers and political preparations that may plunge the nation into battle (i.e. uranium mining, nuclear power, asylum for warmongers and so on.), or the acquisition of extra public debt. Hichilema would do nicely to mirror on this level.

The issue with the multinational mining corporations in Africa is that they’re the leaders of neo-colonial exploitation and expropriation. In actual phrases, Zambia will get far much less from the mines as we speak than it did within the early years of independence, notably following the Mulungushi financial reforms of 1968 that elevated the nationwide stake within the sector. Zambian miners additionally get far much less as we speak in buying energy parity and social advantages from the business. The mining corporations have devised numerous strategies for making certain that a lot of the worth of the copper is collected by their shareholders and the corporate administration, and little or no goes to native staff or the Zambian authorities. There are numerous tips for sustaining this technique, reminiscent of giving kickbacks to authorities officers, using overseas corporations as contractors, utilizing costly expatriates for administration positions (regardless of Zambia having had a Faculty of Mines for near fifty years!), and by switch pricing. However maybe the primary technique for expropriation of worth is to maintain native taxation low, each as income tax and mineral royalty tax. The primary technique that mining corporations deploy to take care of low taxes is to threaten authorities that they’ll scale back mining operations, and even transfer out of Zambia altogether if taxes are elevated. These are credible threats for 2 most important causes. First, any pulling out, and even discount of enlargement programmes, will have an effect on employment in Zambia and scale back tax income, thus the federal government could also be ‘chopping its nostril to spite its face’ if it tries to extend taxes. Secondly, the threats are credible as a result of the mining giants are really international multinational firms, they usually can pretty simply transfer their operations within the path of a rustic the place manufacturing prices are cheaper, taxation charges are decrease, and bribing of presidency officers is even simpler (the Democratic of Republic Congo, for example, would arguably match all three of those standards). In different phrases, a big wealthy multinational is in a robust place to bully a weak African state reminiscent of Zambia, and has a big affect over authorities insurance policies to help the mines by tax holidays, decrease taxation charges, offering subsidies (resembling low cost electrical energy), degrading the commerce unions, overlooking environmental degradation, and so forth.

The makes an attempt by President Edgar Lungu’s administration to extend the mineral tax is subsequently – on the face of it – a laudable effort to face as much as the mining corporations and to ensure we Zambians aren’t bullied into full poverty, however slightly capable of restrict the degrees of externalisation of income in order that the nation can at the very least gather an honest proportion from its mineral wealth. In fact, with Lungu’s corrupt regime, one has to wonder if the threats of elevated mining taxation are only a bluff, and the underlying demand is as an alternative for larger kickbacks and even shareholdings for presidency officers. As well as, there’s the query of whether or not, if the federal government ever succeeds with its demand for greater taxation of the mines, the proceeds will ever attain the poor individuals of Zambia – or will as an alternative merely present extra income for presidency officers to steal. Taking into consideration the previous state of affairs evaluation, one can solely marvel what on Earth Hichilema is doing. What precisely is his curiosity in defending the mines from elevated taxation? Why is Hichilema siding with the pursuits of the predator and towards the pursuits of Zambia? Is he in search of his personal share within the mining corporations? Does he have some longstanding enterprise pursuits with the mines, which can have been obscured by his entry into lively politics? What ‘truthful tax’ has he informed the mines that they’ll pay underneath his presidency? Given the current state of affairs, his implied declare that the brand new mining coverage is unfair can solely be learn to imply that he’s supporting the unwillingness (or is it clean refusal?) by mining corporations to pay a rise in taxes. If Hichilema claims that the mining corporations are saying ‘we’re ready so that you can come’, it’s affordable to suspect that they assume he would supply them a greater deal: decrease taxes, decrease mineral royalties and looser native content material necessities. Does Hichilema advocate this stuff and in that case, why not admit and publicly defend them? Is he reticent as a result of he is aware of such a place will probably be unpopular with Zambian voters? Hichilema is looking for to occupy crucial workplace in Zambia. He can’t afford to have personal ideas on public issues. We, the general public, have to know the place precisely he stands on the brand new mining tax regime. His silence, if something, suggests a secretive closed-door strategy to coverage not a lot better than the brazenly incompetent strategy of President Lungu and the PF.

It’s value noting that the essential financial place is that, for nearly 100 years, mining corporations in Zambia have been milking our riches and engendering poverty and destitution. Our ft stroll on copper, but we stay completely poor, because of inept management from a succession of corruptible political leaders who pawn off the nation for a number of trinkets at a time, accumulate via brazen theft of public assets and the huge sale of Zambian belongings to so-called buyers, and strut round with self-importance when they’re nothing however the disposable playthings of even greater international kleptocrats. Our mineral wealth has been and continues to be taken from us, and once they have taken the whole thing, we will stay with nothing and doubtless be the poorest nation on Earth, with all our wealth transported to Geneva, Beijing, New Delhi, Ottawa, London and New York. From this perspective, Hichilema’s obvious intention to proceed with and to help unbridled exploitation by mines is nothing lower than an act of treason. Whereas he did not be convicted of treason for a visitors violation, he seems to have now invented a way more substantive purpose to be efficiently convicted on the identical cost. If these actually are his plans, probably the most incredible facet of such plans are that he must be so naive as to make them plain earlier than he’s elected, thereby making certain that we will by no means be so silly as to elect him into workplace. For a person who has stated little or nothing about what he’s going to do about large poverty and corruption in Zambia, he now opens his mouth to disclose that his one massive concept is to help and encourage the persevering with exploitation of Zambia by overseas business pursuits!

The reality is that the good thing about protecting minerals within the floor, or banking them for the longer term, far exceeds the financial, environmental and social prices of a nasty deal. So if mining corporations threaten to go away due to the proposed small tax increments, Zambia would do nicely to pave the street for them. It’s time we appeared to longer-term methods moderately than short-term expediency. Banking our assets till such a time that we’re in robust negotiating place or there’s broader shortage for metals that may allow us set improved phrases for ourselves is best than emptying our underground wealth to largely profit overseas business pursuits. One of many main downsides of the present extractive business possession construction is that it’s made for corruption and for so long as the State doesn’t have a decisive possession stake within the strategic mining business, (i.e. greater than 50% as is the case in nations like Botswana, Norway, Sweden, China and so on.), Zambians may also have restricted means to public accountability for stolen assets. It’s because a restricted possession construction (even with larger taxation) provides leverage for almost all shareholders to cover income and obscure minority shareholders. In impact, accountability is elevated the place a publicly owned state enterprise exists. This can be a drawback that extends past Lungu and his administration; it is a matter that drastically benefited Frederick Chiluba and his corrupt associates within the Motion for Multiparty Democracy and, until modified, would within the unlikely occasion of a Hichilema presidency additionally form his behaviour (given his attainable enterprise pursuits within the sector).

One other implication that emerges from Hichilema’s daring declare that the mines ‘are ready for [him] to return’ is that the mines now appear to really feel themselves to be in such a daring and commanding place that they will publicly intervene in Zambian politics. Maybe the mines now really feel highly effective sufficient to behave as king makers, and supply the required funds and help to place Hichilema into workplace. How precisely will they do that? By intentionally inflicting unemployment to be blamed on President Lungu and the PF? By funding Hichilema’s election marketing campaign forward of Zambia’s 2021 election? Furthermore, his assertion that mining corporations help him might simply encourage the ruling get together to be publicly extra hostile throughout negotiations and justifiably accuse them of undermining the federal government. Mining corporations might reply by distancing themselves from Hichilema and he might find yourself alienated from each their help and the help of Zambians. If that is the idea for Hichilema’s technique, then he has rigorously deliberate his personal downfall. By declaring that Zambia’s mining corporations are apparently so eager to put him in energy, Hichilema has, in impact, put himself because the candidate of the mines and consequently forged Lungu because the candidate of the individuals (sure, Lungu, in all probability probably the most incompetent and divisive president that Zambia has ever had). In so doing, the UPND chief might have succeeded in extinguishing the little hope he might have had of profitable the Copperbelt Province, with out which it’s virtually inconceivable for any presidential candidate to win energy.

Can Hichilema overcome fashionable perceptions that he’s beholden to mining pursuits? I significantly doubt it. Hichilema’s cozy relationship with the Brenthurst Basis, a mining foyer established by the Oppenheimer household that favours a low mining tax regime in Africa, locations him firmly inside the bosom of the pursuits of mining capital. The UPND chief has persistently in public statements portrayed himself as extra empathetic to the considerations of mining corporations slightly than the mining communities. I’ve personally by no means heard Hichilema talking in defence of staff towards mining corporations. Neither have I heard him expressing outrage towards what is occurring in North-Western Province, the place we have now allowed the re-creation of spatial apartheid within the new mining areas. Very similar to through the colonial period, mining corporations on ‘the brand new Copperbelt’ have replicated the infamous racial color bar: white mineworkers are paid exceptionally excessive wages, stay in segregated estates with lavish housing and social amenities, whereas their black counterparts who do a lot of the labour are paid considerably much less, housed in distinctively much less lavish settings, and successfully left to fend for themselves. The place is Hichilema in figuring out what appears very very similar to a brand new wave of colonialism? His answer to the woes of mining communities, that he’ll deliver again Anglo America Company, sounds very very similar to the guarantees of a mining CEO, not a possible Head of State. This place has by no means been obscured by him or hidden from Copperbelt residents. It’s in most public pronouncements he makes, and this in all probability explains why most Copperbelt voters won’t ever absolutely belief Hichilema, or seen him as a viable various.

On a current journey to Chingola, I struck a dialog with a miner at Konkola Copper Mine, who advised me why lots of his colleagues don’t help the UPND chief. His observations, which I’ve translated from Bemba language to English, are value quoting at size:

‘Hichilema doesn’t converse for us. When he speaks on mining points, it’s to sentence the federal government or the PF, not the workings of mining corporations or to attract consideration to our low wages, poor working circumstances and the overall lack of security requirements. So lots of my colleagues have died in Chingola and Chililabombwe mines owned by Vedanta’s KCM. For instance, between April and August 2018, my colleagues Kelvin Chongo, Ezekia Mwape, Benson Solochi and Frederick Musonda all died tragically resulting from KCM’s lamentable security report. They died from mining blasts or preventable accidents similar to earth actions. Their deaths, like so many who occurred earlier than them, have been by no means reported within the mainstream media. [Michael] Sata, when he was in opposition, used to talk for us. Now, we really feel orphaned, as Hichilema seems to have little interest in highlighting our plight. Even Chishimba Kambwili, who’s so vocal towards AVIC, is silent on our plight as a result of he’s a provider to the mines… Dying trails us from the second we enter the mine. Each time I depart my home for work, I say goodbye to my household as a result of if you go underground, there isn’t a assure that you’ll return house… Then you will have the issue of suppliers and contactors not being paid on time. KCM might be the worst on this rating of all mining corporations. On the Copperbelt, in case you are not a miner, you’re a contractor or provider of products and providers to the mining corporations. How do suppliers maintain their companies and livelihoods if they don’t seem to be paid? These are a few of the points which are essential right here, however we by no means hear Hichilema increase them.’

The query is: why? Between overseas business pursuits and Zambia, on whose aspect is Hichilema? If his few public pronouncements about mining are something to go by, Hichilema’s affinities lie with the mining corporations he as soon as suggested fairly than the miners who reside, work and typically die bringing copper to the floor. This reveals his poor political judgement, as regardless of their diminished numbers, Zambia’s miners stay politically essential. All issues thought-about, Hichilema is a really lucky politician. The UPND chief is ridding the waves of weaknesses and mediocrity in Zambia’s politics which have created favorable circumstances for him to emerge because the main political various. In fact, he’s merely competing for ‘authorities’ amongst principally a lumpen center class that exploits regional, ethnic and mass poverty of their politics. The truth is, our main political elites, each within the opposition and ruling celebration, are all minimize from the identical class – a parasitic and uninspiring lot that has no actual want for real radical emancipatory politics the nation is so desperately in want of. My want forward of Zambia’s 2021 election is that neither Lungu nor Hichilema seem on the presidential poll. In some methods, the 2 want one another. Lungu’s manifold failures encourage many Zambians to help Hichilema regardless that he provides little aside from that he’s not Lungu.